@archangelolill To be fair, did highlight how weak NHS's efforts to pursue fraud are tho. Easier to dismiss if NHS's own figures were robust
@willshome @archangelolill I say they're not robust. If only pharma & dentistry fraud are examined, ignoring salary/procurement, they're not
-
-
@C7RKY @archangelolill For pharma & dentistry in the NHS. The spurious $7 billion included fostering, social care figures and 6 nations. -
@willshome @archangelolill I agree the £7bn is spurious. As is the £5bn figure. My point is, so is NHS's £250m figure. They just don't look. -
@C7RKY @archangelolill The NHS figure is evidence-based so not spurious. That it doesn't cover everything is another question. -
@willshome @archangelolill It's misrepresentative of the true level of fraud. They're looking selectively & ignoring the bulk. So..spurious. -
@C7RKY @archangelolill You'd rather choose the made-up figures of a saleman than anything emanating from the NHS. That's your agenda. -
@willshome RE You seem to have a short memory? Was only earlier in this thread. > https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/449260807294308353 … @archangelolill I choose neither!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.