@Snyberwiz @meandme10 @Dr_Ellie @22cantons Sure, but industry is where most research comes from & that means just a 50% chance of publishing
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@meandme10@Dr_Ellie@22cantons I do have a major concern about pharma not publishing -ve results. That does need to change.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Snyberwiz
@Snyberwiz@meandme10@Dr_Ellie@22cantons It renders the value of what IS published, relatively meaningless for me. Unscientific, at least.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Snyberwiz
@Snyberwiz 'Probably' valid, is the key word for me there. It's unclear what's hidden, which may in turn undermine what has been published.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Snyberwiz
@Snyberwiz I want to believe that, but I'm far from convinced of it I'm afraid. I just went researching. What I *didn't* find spoke volumes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Snyberwiz
@Snyberwiz Indeed. Never used to be cynical. But watched my son scream in agony as MMR brain damaged him. Makes one ask questions, I guess?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Snyberwiz Thank you. I do still try to be 'scientific' vs emotional in my views tho. I just wish I found the same elsewhere. V worrying tbh
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.