@futureidentity Yes, you're right - but can't we do both?
-
-
Replying to @PaulbernalUK
@PaulbernalUK Vulnerability analysis: health data disclosed to others is vulnerable to unintended/malicious use. [Decide counter-measures]2 replies 3 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @futureidentity
.
@futureidentity@PaulbernalUK What counter-measures would be effective, in protecting against malicious use by some future, draconian gov?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@futureidentity@PaulbernalUK future draconian government? :-)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimGough3
@TimGough3@futureidentity@PaulbernalUK Well...I had to 'frame' it somehow. ;-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @futureidentity
@futureidentity Wonder how that risk assessment might change, if it became clear HSCIC intend to take 148/151 data fields even if opted-out?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @futureidentity
@futureidentity Well that's my concern at this time. I don't believe this model has changed, despite the impression >pic.twitter.com/jlNCgpCLJF
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY Seriously, though: "trimmed" commits them to nothing in terms of pseudonymity/anonymity.#PigInAPoke1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@futureidentity Trust me, that thought has been on my mind for some time. There has been serious, heavy-duty deception on display throughout
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.