@PeterFRMills @Nuffbioethics Which is reasonable,but it's a problematic term when many portray ppl raising #caredata risks as 'scaremongers'
-
-
Replying to @WTBDavidG
@WTBDavidG@Nuffbioethics Some suggest not opting out welcomes in discrimination, others that opting out is almost euthanasia by negligence.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterFRMills
@PeterFRMills@Nuffbioethics Need to be careful here,#Caredata certainly opens up the possibility of me being discriminated against.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WTBDavidG
@WTBDavidG@Nuffbioethics so should not the appropriate principle with which to confront uncertainty be caution?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeterFRMills
@PeterFRMills@Nuffbioethics Absolutely, my industry required to deal with any risk over 1^10-9. Can clearly demonstrate#Caredata risks 1/21 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WTBDavidG
@PeterFRMills@Nuffbioethics Problem seems to be getting the guardians of#Caredata to acknowledge them as real concerns. 2/21 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WTBDavidG
@WTBDavidG@Nuffbioethics I hope our report - when it comes - will examine them fairly. Do feed in any relevant information.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @PeterFRMills
@PeterFRMills@WTBDavidG@Nuffbioethics 1 thought: "deprive pts of a meaningful opportunity to opt out" Comms aside, I think opt-out is fake1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
@PeterFRMills@WTBDavidG@Nuffbioethics There are a few diff links to go into here, but this explains why I say so >https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/443384652402012160 …John Clarke added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@PeterFRMills Welcome. Thought your piece was well-balanced by current standards. But I think this is still the plan>pic.twitter.com/jlNCgpCLJF
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.