@C7RKY Extraction of obj codes HAS to be seperate else obj COULD be associated with other (clinical) data. Daft/dangerous to do otherwise!
-
-
Replying to @medConfidential
@medConfidential Appreciated, but my initial impression was that this was the confirmation our data would not leave GP. If not here, where?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @medConfidential
For the benefit of anyone following this
#caredata thread the chat went onto DM &@medConfidential now 'gets me'. I maintain opt-out is fake1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @medConfidential
@medConfidential@C7RKY how should opt out work with data flows needed for invoice validation/payments?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHCox
.
@JuliaHCox@medConfidential That's a figure which can be aggregated, surely Julia? This was more about individual clinical data collection.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@medConfidential its event level data for secondary care which flows to commissioners. how should type2 opt out work re invoices?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JuliaHCox
@JuliaHCox@medConfidential I'm not going to pretend to know that one. Flows from where though, if secondary care? HES?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@medConfidential yes - SUS/HES so I am asking your views on how type 2 objection should work.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JuliaHCox @medConfidential Does that flow take some form other than aggregated currently then? I hadn't anticipate a change there tbh.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.