I've had chance to look again at this letter @medConfidential >
http://medconfidential.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2014-02-18-Reply-from-Mark-Davies.pdf …
I'm unconvinced the opt-out has changed.
#caredata
-
-
@medConfidential Opening sentence in letter qualifies & limits crucial 1st paragraph, so can relate to requirement to apply obj codes only. -
Means the phrase "No other additional data will be extracted" can be claimed to relate only to this purpose. Needs clarity
@medConfidential -
@C7RKY It could... But how stupid do you think they are? We'd know, so public would know. More concerned about "currently", which needs work -
@medConfidential I don't think they're stupid at all. On the contrary. Whilst I agree 'currently' is a concern, opt-out validity is more so.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.