I've had chance to look again at this letter @medConfidential >
http://medconfidential.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2014-02-18-Reply-from-Mark-Davies.pdf …
I'm unconvinced the opt-out has changed.
#caredata
4 #caredata pt options:
1 No opt out
2 Type 1 only
3 Type 2 only
4 Type 1 & Type 2
What data is taken for each?
@Snyberwiz @medConfidential
-
-
@C7RKY@medConfidential Sounds good. Might also help if they also provide technical info on how extraction program interrogates each recordThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY@Snyberwiz ..flowing if you had opted out under previous arrangement. Fix not perfect, but loopholes are being closed. -
@medConfidential@C7RKY Many thanks for that info. Can we assume that earlier opt outs are now treated in the revised way? -
@Snyberwiz@C7RKY No data has left GP systems. Opt out works on codes present, which will now work in way described when extraction begins.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY@Snyberwiz ..no clinical data. 4 - same as 3, plus will be part of aggregate count of opt outs. VASTLY different to clinical data...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY@Snyberwiz codes per practice. 3 = objection code (9Nu4), NHS number to be used solely to spot data incoming to HSCIC, practice ID...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY@Snyberwiz 1 = all data in Appendix A of http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/cd-ces-tech-spec.pdf … in identifiable form. 2 = no data, but aggregate count of objection..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.