@Cleverestcookie Not according to the MDU article Cathy. But doctors do have to get consent from patients to record in most circumstances.
@Cleverestcookie I agree. So back to why doesn't it always happen? Not enough time allocated to consultations? Paternalism? Incompetence?
-
-
@C7RKY running at least 30 mins late and patients don't moan. Consultations are longer. Time may be prob in primary care. -
@Cleverestcookie Whatever the reason, with recording becoming a bigger factor, I suspect something is going to have to change for the better -
@C7RKY personalised info should be a given. -
.
@Cleverestcookie Of course. But need to establish that info in a manner which can't later be changed. 'Weeding & seeding' is too common now -
@C7RKY printed and signed sounds good to me. -
@Cleverestcookie As long as everyone gets a copy at the time it's signed. I've been on the receiving end of tricks around that issue though. -
@C7RKY deary me! Well if the patient has a dated, signed copy at the time then whatever hospital do with their copy is irrelevant? -
@Cleverestcookie That's absolutely true. But when hospitals are graded 'met standard' despite 85% of pt consent forms wrongfully retained? - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY range of reasons dependent on individuals, culture of establishment. Time shouldn't be problem in sec care as IME they're always >>>Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.