"Patients do not need their doctors' permission to tape a consultation" MDU has to concede And you should. EVERY time http://www.themdu.com/guidance-and-advice/latest-updates-and-advice/what-should-you-do-if-a-patient-wants-to-record-a-consultation …
@Cleverestcookie I didn't expect it either, but that's exactly what I've found tbh. Unsure why? More you say, more you can get caught out?
-
-
@C7RKY the more information, clearly presented, with benefits/hazards explained, the better outcome for all parties. -
@Cleverestcookie I agree. So back to why doesn't it always happen? Not enough time allocated to consultations? Paternalism? Incompetence? -
@C7RKY running at least 30 mins late and patients don't moan. Consultations are longer. Time may be prob in primary care. -
@Cleverestcookie Whatever the reason, with recording becoming a bigger factor, I suspect something is going to have to change for the better -
@C7RKY personalised info should be a given. -
.
@Cleverestcookie Of course. But need to establish that info in a manner which can't later be changed. 'Weeding & seeding' is too common now -
@C7RKY printed and signed sounds good to me. -
@Cleverestcookie As long as everyone gets a copy at the time it's signed. I've been on the receiving end of tricks around that issue though. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY the more you explain to the patient and gain their consent, the better for everyone! Most patients will go with an expert's view >>>Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.