.@medConfidential @0spotz @PaulbernalUK @docneilb @tkelsey1 But we've nothing at all to say the opt-out has changed from the fake version??
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
So.. "Opt out should now work as people expected." >Which is what now then Phil?
@medConfidential @0spotz@PaulbernalUK@docneilb@tkelsey12 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY @0spotz@PaulbernalUK@docneilb@tkelsey1 9Nu0 = no data leaves GP practice. 9Nu4 = NHS no. *only* to HSCIC to spot incoming data...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @medConfidential
.
@medConfidential @0spotz@PaulbernalUK@docneilb@tkelsey1 And that Type 1 is now TRULY no data? Not some fancy definition of confidential?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY @0spotz@PaulbernalUK@docneilb@tkelsey1 All that leaves GP is an aggregate count of 9Nu0s - i.e. how many have opted out, not who1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @medConfidential
@medConfidential @0spotz@PaulbernalUK@docneilb@tkelsey1 Right. So that does seem to permit a full HSCIC opt-out now then? Thank you!!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@medConfidential @0spotz@PaulbernalUK@docneilb@tkelsey1 And can you give us an indication of what the legislation is designed to achieve?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY @0spotz@PaulbernalUK@docneilb@tkelsey1 See http://medconfidential.org/2014/press-release-what-will-the-raft-of-new-care-data-legislation-actually-achieve/ … for other stuff + comment1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @medConfidential
@medConfidential Thanks Phil. I'll take a look. Sorry to rag on you but feel the need to u/stand this intricately. Too important to be blind2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@medConfidential Would you be kind enough to follow, so I might DM you? Thanks...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.