.@0spotz @katemasters67 Oh fabulous. This just gets better. All things which they didn't consider, as they never intended to offer opt-out?
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY @0spotz@katemasters67 John, read the care.data PIA v1.0, it makes this position quite clear.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TimGough3
@TimGough3@C7RKY @0spotz isn't that something that would have been used in the planning stages? Whenever that was.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
@katemasters67@C7RKY @0spotz Yes, ideally Kate!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimGough3
@TimGough3@C7RKY @0spotz so does it still carry any weight? Or are they starting again with the whole process?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
@katemasters67@C7RKY @0spotz I hope so! http://www.dataprotectionessentials.com/blogs/news/12562317-questions-a-care-data-pia-needs-to-answer …2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TimGough3
@TimGough3@katemasters67@C7RKY @0spotz http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/ehi/9205/nhs-will-be-dependent-on-ehrs----hunt … 'Hunt said NHS wlll “get through” heatd public debate scheme has caused' Hmm2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
I think that depends on how many people work this lot out in time. > https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/439987425738100737 … @SusiHarris @TimGough3 @katemasters67 @0spotz
John Clarke added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.