@metaburbia care.data is a good thing. It will save lives now and in the future. We must support it
-
-
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp we 'must'? Fid you bother reading the Goldacre piece? Your blinkered gung-ho approach isn't winning support. Address the issues.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @metaburbia
@metaburbia I have addressed issues - not as eloquently as@bengoldacre but nevertheless same points2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp sad to see you say in Times that the data shared is not reidentifiable but I assume you've changed yr view on that?@metaburbia1 reply 4 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bengoldacre
@bengoldacre@metaburbia if you have skills, access, malevolent motives then may be you can6 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp@bengoldacre@metaburbia it is very much a false reassurance though, isn't it? COI: I tell my patients their data are safe...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jodyaberdein
@jodyaberdein@bengoldacre@metaburbia their data is safe. But man made systems have man made errors3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp@jodyaberdein@bengoldacre sorry but doesn't past experience sggst data may well not be safe for reasons other than human error?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @metaburbia
@metaburbia@jodyaberdein@bengoldacre no- they used to remove uterus's for hysteria. Don't now4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp@jodyaberdein@bengoldacre ',,,gave insurance cos hospital records of millions of patients, pseudonymised, but re-identifiable'1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
.@metaburbia @clarercgp @jodyaberdein @bengoldacre And even w/o re-ID, offered means to enhance insurance profits at the expense of public
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.