Would those who are speaking for or against #care.data please disclose their conflicts of interest. Thanks
-
-
Replying to @ClareGerada1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @metaburbia
@metaburbia care.data is a good thing. It will save lives now and in the future. We must support it6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp we 'must'? Fid you bother reading the Goldacre piece? Your blinkered gung-ho approach isn't winning support. Address the issues.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @metaburbia
@metaburbia I have addressed issues - not as eloquently as@bengoldacre but nevertheless same points2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp sad to see you say in Times that the data shared is not reidentifiable but I assume you've changed yr view on that?@metaburbia1 reply 4 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bengoldacre
@bengoldacre@metaburbia if you have skills, access, malevolent motives then may be you can6 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp@bengoldacre@metaburbia it is very much a false reassurance though, isn't it? COI: I tell my patients their data are safe...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jodyaberdein
@jodyaberdein@bengoldacre@metaburbia their data is safe. But man made systems have man made errors3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
.@clarercgp @jodyaberdein @bengoldacre @metaburbia Heard you say on Newsnight that you know nothing about computers so how can you say that?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.