.@katemasters67 It allows them to refine underwriting limits & exclusions. Basically helps them avoid offering cover which actually pays out
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
-
Replying to @katemasters67
Bear in mind it's a specific category: critical illness. They don't care about HELPING pts' conditions, just PREDICTING them.
@katemasters671 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
It'd require a different data-set for that, but if they still have the raw data, there's nothing stopping them doing that too
@katemasters673 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
@katemasters67 Good luck finding that out, for anything that happened more than 10 months ago...apparently! >https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/439161507876995074 …John Clarke added,
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
.
@katemasters67 That'll be a start, but if anyone actually grasps the financial implications of this, there really should be an inquiry imho2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
.@katemasters67 Exactly what I just said too! > https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/439465774349316096 …
:)
John Clarke added,
-
-
Replying to @katemasters67
.
@katemasters67 It could take many, many years, before I find that boring. Really is good. Captured the surreal events perfectly. *chuckles*0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.