.@katemasters67 It allows them to refine underwriting limits & exclusions. Basically helps them avoid offering cover which actually pays out
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
-
Replying to @katemasters67
Bear in mind it's a specific category: critical illness. They don't care about HELPING pts' conditions, just PREDICTING them.
@katemasters671 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
It'd require a different data-set for that, but if they still have the raw data, there's nothing stopping them doing that too
@katemasters673 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
@katemasters67 Good luck finding that out, for anything that happened more than 10 months ago...apparently! >https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/439161507876995074 …John Clarke added,
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
.
@katemasters67 That'll be a start, but if anyone actually grasps the financial implications of this, there really should be an inquiry imho2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
.@katemasters67 And I'm fairly certain there are some hard-core tactics at play, with multiple players all distracting debate to re-ID issue
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.