@C7RKY What is "questionable" about @amcunningham trying to get the facts about this story? I don't see her making a judgement either way.
-
-
-
@markhawker@amcunningham 1. Consent breached 2. Public loss at the expense of insurance company profit Explained, but not reflected. -
@C7RKY@amcunningham What does that have to do with story of postcodes and date of births shared? Need for facts before interpretation. -
@markhawker@amcunningham No, we don't. This is a rip-off either way. Whether as a group, or identified individuals. Public lose both ways. -
@C7RKY@amcunningham Right, so you'd advocate hysterics before establishing the facts? That seems odd to me. -
.
@markhawker@amcunningham Oh, go away you antagonistic man! You've clearly a v limited grasp of the issue. Learn & come back when you have. -
.
@C7RKY Are you done with the condescension now? (@amcunningham) -
@markhawker@amcunningham *bored* You'll see... - 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY As in,@amcunningham's personal tastes and psychology have no bearing on what the truth of the matter actually is.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.