@smithsam does the document day that individuals were identified and their premiums raised? Or was this about profiling?
-
-
Replying to @amcunningham
@amcunningham@smithsam Does either sound good to you though? Either way, insurance companies profited at the public's expense because of it2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amcunningham
.
@amcunningham@smithsam I already know. And so can tell you now, we got sold down the river by having our data shared here. GP data worse.4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@amcunningham@smithsam What worries me most is that dishonest doctors may write medical records 2 order for statistics &/or profit!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willcpowell
@willcpowell so a GP changes notes of 10000 patients... impact in a data set of 50 million???@C7RKY@smithsam1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amcunningham
@amcunningham@C7RKY@smithsam Do you accept some doctors falsify medical records & are untruthful about circumstances of medical errors?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willcpowell
@willcpowell sadly yes:( but these big datasets are massive things and I don't think one or even 20 could rig them...@C7RKY@smithsam2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @amcunningham
@amcunningham@C7RKY@smithsam Thank you. It just worries me that there may be an ulterior motive for sharing med recs. I hope I'm wrong :(1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@willcpowell @amcunningham @smithsam Oh no, you're right there Will. There are plenty of motives to consider, just scaled up a lot more too.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.