@C7RKY @JuliaHCox *slumps onto desk* two-hundred-and-seventy-four pages? I just cut my finger. I will NEVER be eligible.
-
-
@C7RKY@katemasters67@JuliaHCox provide health data which needs to be correct so isn't it better that premiums better reflect population? -
@Cleverestcookie@katemasters67@JuliaHCox God no! They're in business on a risk/reward basis. Getting this data merely allows them to avoid -
@Cleverestcookie@katemasters67@JuliaHCox >the risks that will result in claims. More profit for them, less payouts for us. By design. -
@C7RKY@katemasters67@JuliaHCox And as businesses, no point in having products nobody wants so still need to be attractive to customers -
@Cleverestcookie@katemasters67@JuliaHCox But that's for them to judge, based on claims. Just a 2 player game. Insurance vs public. We lose -
@C7RKY@katemasters67@JuliaHCox the industry is regulated. I'd rather have my premium based on an accurate risk assessment. -
@Cleverestcookie@katemasters67@JuliaHCox I worked in that industry for 25yrs, at a senior level. I promise you, you're worse off for this. -
@C7RKY@katemasters67@JuliaHCox won't bother with insurance then if no advantage. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY@katemasters67@JuliaHCox isn't it better to have accurately weighted risk for insurance? I'd prefer it. Indiv customers have to >>>Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY@JuliaHCox all this deceit just adds to the concerns.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.