@Privateallergy @tkelsey1 @jappleby123 I want researchers to have access to full anonymised data set to improve outcomes, I won't opt out
-
-
@C7RKY@Privateallergy my tweet in context of named data btw -
.
@jappleby123@Privateallergy As I've pointed out, that's irrelevant. https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/437994643800997888 … And what is named data?pic.twitter.com/QKgV9FCbgb
-
@C7RKY@Privateallergy it's relevant cos that was context of that tweet's discussion -
@jappleby123@Privateallergy Minor point. They make money from access to our medical data either way. Which covers your question. -
@C7RKY@Privateallergy well, your objection also applies to say pharma using data to develop drugs? is your objection abt 'making money'? -
.
@jappleby123@Privateallergy Yes, I object to that too, as long as 50% of studies go unpublished & what remains is claimed to be 'science'. -
.
@jappleby123@Privateallergy But on insurance. This is a 2 player game. If you help the insurance industry win, one guess who loses?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.