@MatSilk @C7RKY @NHSE_Dean @NHSE_Ruth it's Russian Roulette
-
-
Replying to @MossLorraine
@MossLorraine@C7RKY@NHSE_Dean@NHSE_Ruth Disagree - whole Wakefield think was shown to be clearly wrong years ago.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@C7RKY@NHSE_Dean@NHSE_Ruth really? Why so many replicated his findings then1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MossLorraine
@MossLorraine@C7RKY Have they? Perhaps like him linked to industry funding?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@MossLorraine I can't believe you're even trying to use that argument, when it describes most 'evidence' you're happy to quote too.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@MossLorraine What evidence have I quoted John? Autism/MMR link completely debunked. Nothing to do with other med trial issues.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatSilk
John Clarke Retweeted 💥M 💥
@MatSilk@MossLorraine Blimey, that's a short memory you have there Matthew. It was only higher up this same thread.https://twitter.com/matsilk/status/436491225034936320 …John Clarke added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@MossLorraine Consensus is no link between MMR/autism, no credible research has found it. I quoted no specific studies.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@MossLorraine There is no credible research when half of it is hidden. And 'quite the opposite' was your phrase. Seems clear to me.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@MossLorraine Don't be so pedantic John. The onus is on s/one to prove the link - are you suggesting these have been suppressed?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MatSilk @MossLorraine Yes. That's exactly what I'm suggesting. And I believe onus is on proving safety, not risk. Precautionary principle??
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.