RT @ConversationUK: Your NHS data is completely anonymous – until it isn't http://bit.ly/M47mjf #mostread @C7RKY
-
-
Replying to @ianmsyme
.
@ianmsyme@ConversationUK "Kelsey either knows something we don’t, or doesn’t fully understand anonymisation" >I know where my money goes..2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
.Hmmm...wonder if this is what Kelsey knows that we don't? Did they redefine 'anonymised'?
@ianmsyme@ConversationUKpic.twitter.com/nDZIucRiOi
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@ianmsyme@ConversationUK which makes the threshold for compliance quite low??1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie@ianmsyme@ConversationUK Private co.s stricter than NHS? Afraid I disagree, having worked in many. Profit often trumps law3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@ianmsyme@ConversationUK commenting on what companies subsequently may or may not do, just their eligibility to receive.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cleverestcookie
@Cleverestcookie@ianmsyme@ConversationUK Understood, but this is about an individual's right to weigh that subsequent risk & consent. No?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
.
@Cleverestcookie@ianmsyme@ConversationUK I'm concerned that we are on the receiving end of 'verbal sleight of hand' here. Many examples.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@ianmsyme@ConversationUK agree rushed through without adequate time to scrutinise the detail and comment1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Cleverestcookie @ianmsyme @ConversationUK Rushed through by design? Seen Kelsey's 09 article? We must not be allowed to succeed, apparently
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.