If this pile of care.data spin from Clare Gerada wasn't bad enough, she puts an MMR/autism cherry on top for me. Grrr http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2014/02/12/clare-gerada-on-why-care-data-will-be-transformational-to-the-nhs/ …
@Cleverestcookie I reflect back on our 'only 50% of pharma studies published' conversation, for one - I still prefer science to spin.
-
-
@Cleverestcookie And not a single mention of the consent issue - the very thing that's creating the backlash.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY yes, but lots of people voice an opinion, and are entitled to. We disagree but I respect that you can have different view from me -
@Cleverestcookie I'm happy to consider all views. My golden rule is 'best idea wins', from whatever source. But only if all facts considered -
@C7RKY but rarely does a single person present all the facts in a balanced piece. I am impressed when I find it. -
@Cleverestcookie Sure, but rarely does someone have the profile of an ex RCGP Chair. Frankly I expect more, when wading into a touchy debate -
@C7RKY often depends on personality, I find -
@Cleverestcookie Not sure that's as important as the (ex) role in this case. Opinions, good or bad, take on implied credibility as a result. -
@C7RKY or has an ex-position doesn't mean they necessarily have fully informed opinion or represent the body of people. Look at politicians! -
@Cleverestcookie I'll say. This article being a prime example of someone lacking just that. Don't worry...the scepticism is strong in me! ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.