@david_colquhoun Why not someone who has a product, who's value is undermined by the findings of the study? Is that so far-fetched? Not sure
-
-
Replying to @david_colquhoun
@david_colquhoun That a study's findings show there may be no further market for your own existing product, is reason to publish? How so?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@david_colquhoun With 8k+ followers, perhaps you missed this question? Can't imagine you'd 'go quiet', after suggesting@regnans had done so1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @david_colquhoun
@david_colquhoun@regnans Perhaps. Exposing pts to radiation as a cancer treatment, may have met with similar scorn at first tho, to be fair1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY
@david_colquhoun@regnans That's why we need genuine, 100% transparent science imho. To distinguish between fact & hypothesis.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @david_colquhoun
@david_colquhoun@regnans Maybe I'm ignorant of the subtleties? But that anything is hidden, causes such science to be questionable for me.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@david_colquhoun @regnans Good man. Thank you! I welcome anyone supporting that. As I said, I'm a fan of science (& I'm selling nothing!) :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.