@david_colquhoun I'm afraid unlike you, I haven't yet ruled out +ve ones being hidden, if they prove 'inconvenient' for another product line
@Cleverestcookie @david_colquhoun @regnans I didn't say 100% certain, I said 100% transparent. Otherwise, probabilty assumption undermined?
-
-
@C7RKY@Cleverestcookie@regnans Yes of course. but it is neg trails that are hidden and that can't change a result that is already neg -
@david_colquhoun@Cleverestcookie@regnans As I sad, I'm afraid I don't yet share that assumption with you. I'm open minded on what's hidden -
@C7RKY@Cleverestcookie@regnans it's well documented. read Goldacre ot Gotzsche -
@david_colquhoun@Cleverestcookie@regnans That's a new ref for me, thank you. 'Well documented' & 'hidden' seem strange bed-fellows tho? -
@C7RKY@david_colquhoun@regnans hidden may just mean not obvious, not always implication of subterfuge. Can usually see if things missing -
@Cleverestcookie@david_colquhoun@regnans I'm talking about the 50% of studies that pharma companies don't publish. Invites doubt for me... -
@C7RKY@david_colquhoun@regnans I would like to see everything so can feel the context. May not understand it all, but I'm a pedant
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.