@david_colquhoun I've not said anything. Don't like to do that without access to all the evidence. Hence my interest in unpublished studies.
@david_colquhoun @regnans That's why we need genuine, 100% transparent science imho. To distinguish between fact & hypothesis.
-
-
-
@david_colquhoun@regnans Maybe I'm ignorant of the subtleties? But that anything is hidden, causes such science to be questionable for me. -
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY@david_colquhoun@regnans but can we ever be 100% certain? Often it's assessing the probability of something being correct for now... -
@Cleverestcookie@david_colquhoun@regnans I didn't say 100% certain, I said 100% transparent. Otherwise, probabilty assumption undermined? -
@C7RKY@Cleverestcookie@regnans Yes of course. but it is neg trails that are hidden and that can't change a result that is already neg -
@david_colquhoun@Cleverestcookie@regnans As I sad, I'm afraid I don't yet share that assumption with you. I'm open minded on what's hidden -
@C7RKY@Cleverestcookie@regnans it's well documented. read Goldacre ot Gotzsche -
@david_colquhoun@Cleverestcookie@regnans That's a new ref for me, thank you. 'Well documented' & 'hidden' seem strange bed-fellows tho? -
@C7RKY@david_colquhoun@regnans hidden may just mean not obvious, not always implication of subterfuge. Can usually see if things missing -
@Cleverestcookie@david_colquhoun@regnans I'm talking about the 50% of studies that pharma companies don't publish. Invites doubt for me... - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.