@david_colquhoun You're right, I don't understand that. The what rises if -ve tests hidden sorry? Does it somehow offset what's hidden?
@david_colquhoun That a study's findings show there may be no further market for your own existing product, is reason to publish? How so?
-
-
@C7RKY no, the industry is sufficiently dishonest to supress it. but the ones that ARE published are negative despite thanThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@C7RKY pub of trials of the sort you suggest would just make results even more overwhelmingly negative!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@david_colquhoun With 8k+ followers, perhaps you missed this question? Can't imagine you'd 'go quiet', after suggesting@regnans had done so -
-
@david_colquhoun@regnans Perhaps. Exposing pts to radiation as a cancer treatment, may have met with similar scorn at first tho, to be fair -
@david_colquhoun@regnans That's why we need genuine, 100% transparent science imho. To distinguish between fact & hypothesis. -
-
@david_colquhoun@regnans Maybe I'm ignorant of the subtleties? But that anything is hidden, causes such science to be questionable for me. -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.