@david_colquhoun @regnans @JonInNotts @FriendsOfSciMed @latrobe I don't know what's hidden, any more than you likely do. Undermines all, no?
@david_colquhoun I'm afraid unlike you, I haven't yet ruled out +ve ones being hidden, if they prove 'inconvenient' for another product line
-
-
@C7RKY who on earth would hide a postive trial?! -
@david_colquhoun Why not someone who has a product, who's value is undermined by the findings of the study? Is that so far-fetched? Not sure -
@C7RKY that's a reason to publish ps results, not to suppress them -
@david_colquhoun That a study's findings show there may be no further market for your own existing product, is reason to publish? How so? -
@C7RKY no, the industry is sufficiently dishonest to supress it. but the ones that ARE published are negative despite than
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY you'd have to think that a rival huckster had tested competitor's product and found it worked. That's a bit far fetchedThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.