@david_colquhoun @regnans @JonInNotts @FriendsOfSciMed @latrobe Qn: With only 50% of studies ever published, how is any claim 'scientific'?
@david_colquhoun I've not said anything. Don't like to do that without access to all the evidence. Hence my interest in unpublished studies.
-
-
@C7RKY we are all interested in unpublished studies. but if supplement huckster had hidden neg ones it would only reinforce the conclusions! -
@david_colquhoun I'm afraid unlike you, I haven't yet ruled out +ve ones being hidden, if they prove 'inconvenient' for another product line -
@C7RKY who on earth would hide a postive trial?! -
@david_colquhoun Why not someone who has a product, who's value is undermined by the findings of the study? Is that so far-fetched? Not sure -
@C7RKY that's a reason to publish ps results, not to suppress them -
@david_colquhoun That a study's findings show there may be no further market for your own existing product, is reason to publish? How so? -
@C7RKY no, the industry is sufficiently dishonest to supress it. but the ones that ARE published are negative despite than
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.