@david_colquhoun @JonInNotts @FriendsOfSciMed @latrobe It is simple then that the evidence says that supplements DO benefit SOME people.
-
-
Replying to @regnans
@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe references please!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @david_colquhoun
@david_colquhoun @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe just use the references you used to state that supplements don't benefit *most people4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @regnans
I notice that
@regnans has gone very quiet since I asked for the evidence @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @david_colquhoun
@david_colquhoun@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe Qn: With only 50% of studies ever published, how is any claim 'scientific'?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe trials of supplements are negative. or do you think posyive ones are being hidden?!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @david_colquhoun
@david_colquhoun@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe I don't know what's hidden, any more than you likely do. Undermines all, no?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe why are you so keen to defend things that have failed tests? Selling something?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @david_colquhoun
@david_colquhoun@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe Absolutely not. I'm a fan of science. But the old-fashioned transparent type1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe of course, but don't see what that's got to do with supplements1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@david_colquhoun @regnans @JonInNotts @FriendsOfSciMed @latrobe Because you seem v certain of your position & wondered how, given 50% figure
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.