@JonInNotts @david_colquhoun @FriendsOfSciMed @latrobe Absolutes like all Vitamin supplements are unproven and a waste of money?
@david_colquhoun @regnans @JonInNotts @FriendsOfSciMed @latrobe I don't know what's hidden, any more than you likely do. Undermines all, no?
-
-
@C7RKY@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe not unless you ebrace the idea that someone is hiding +ve results. That's ridciulous! -
@david_colquhoun@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe More ridculous than hiding -ve ones & claiming what remains is 'scientific'? -
@C7RKY@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe sorry, you don't seem to understand, The pro srises when neg tests are hidden -
@david_colquhoun You're right, I don't understand that. The what rises if -ve tests hidden sorry? Does it somehow offset what's hidden? -
@C7RKY oops. The PROBLEM arises when negative tests are hidden -
@C7RKY since almost all the publshed tests ARE negative, I see no problem -
@david_colquhoun Yes, but positive tests are twice as likely to be published as negative ones, I gather? That doesn't concern you? Does me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe why are you so keen to defend things that have failed tests? Selling something? -
@david_colquhoun@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe Absolutely not. I'm a fan of science. But the old-fashioned transparent type -
@C7RKY@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe of course, but don't see what that's got to do with supplements -
@david_colquhoun@regnans @JonInNotts@FriendsOfSciMed@latrobe Because you seem v certain of your position & wondered how, given 50% figure
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.