On @BBCr4today tomorrow trying to explain how we have nothing to fear & everything to gain from #nhs care.data
-
-
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp@BBCr4today Good luck! Sometimes people conflate risks with current way of doing things with new systems, which is frustrating2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@BBCr4today imagine how data we haemorrhage every time we buy something on line. Surely we can accept tiny risk to cure disease2 replies 4 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp@BBCr4today Am fully behind better use of e-records, plenty more work to do convincing others tho.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@BBCr4today not about e-records though. It's about coded anonymous data being used to monitor disease & trends4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp@MatSilk@BBCr4today Clare the extract for#caredata from gp systems is identifiable not anonymous. Who said it was anonymous?2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @JuliaHCox
@JuliaHCox@MatSilk@BBCr4today it's NOT - how would you identify it legally ? It's stripped off identifiers - only linked on safe haven6 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ClareGerada
@clarercgp@JuliaHCox@MatSilk@BBCr4today Clare, the data uploaded from GP systems is clearly identifiable data2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @docneilb
@clarercgp@JuliaHCox@MatSilk@BBCr4today aka "personal confidential data " aka "red" data1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @docneilb
@clarercgp@JuliaHCox@MatSilk@BBCr4today it remains that way at HSCIC, that's why they can release it as Green, Amber AND Red data (s251)1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@docneilb @clarercgp @JuliaHCox @MatSilk @BBCr4today Security of main database aside, how anonymous are we really? >
http://dare.uva.nl/document/204557
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.