@katemasters67 @MatSilk I think they're being cavalier in that position personally. Opt-out is assumed consent already, w/o junk mail comms.
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@katemasters67 I can understand that position, but I imagine that it's not viable to do a national roll out as opt-in.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@katemasters67 Exactly. Cart/horse springs to mind. They shd check they have something to roll out, by seeing how many agree first.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@katemasters67 I don't know. I'm personally very relaxed about the whole thing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@katemasters67 I'm less so. I've worked in the insurance world. You've no idea what lengths they'll go to. And as for big pharma...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @katemasters67
@katemasters67@C7RKY Seriously, that's not going to happen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@katemasters67 No, it should go through a process before release, but it's what happens once it's sent elsewhere. No control then.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@MatSilk:@C7RKY@katemasters67 Yes, this is the rub. It's not the system security per se, but who and for what at the other end.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@katemasters67 And that risk is huge. With the info they're sharing, literally almost everyone will be identifiable. It's wide open1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
@MatSilk @katemasters67 I did ask if articles like these 2 were of any concern to Tim Kelsey, but got no reply. >https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/429197633186701312 …
John Clarke added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.