@C7RKY @PaulbernalUK @tkelsey1 @amcunningham @GeraintLewis unless they had opted out of junk mail then they will know (less than) nothing.
-
-
Replying to @katemasters67
@katemasters67@PaulbernalUK@tkelsey1@amcunningham@GeraintLewis Good point. Plus unreliability of the post itself - I've not had mine eg.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@katemasters67 NHSE said that you'd still receive the information leaflet even if you didn't get junk mail1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@katemasters67 Oh I get junk mail ok just not this. We're talking letter box stuffing by agency posties tho. Inside other items etc2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@katemasters67 Just pointing our, more in reference to Kate's tweet, that ppl who opt out of junk mail will - in theory - get it1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MatSilk
@MatSilk@katemasters67 So they've remembered to bypass the Mail Preference Service? Well thank heaven for small mercies on that at least :)2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67
@katemasters67@MatSilk I think they're being cavalier in that position personally. Opt-out is assumed consent already, w/o junk mail comms.3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @katemasters671 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@katemasters67 @MatSilk Probably a v carefully crafted statement, given significance of min standard in such a hugely confidential data set
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.