@PutneyDebates @tkelsey1 @bainesy1969 @GeraintLewis @JonathanBliss And it's our data that's then out in the wilds...
-
-
Replying to @PaulbernalUK
@PaulbernalUK more about CPRD plans http://www.ncin.org.uk/view?rid=2087 <- this is your issue?@PutneyDebates@tkelsey1@bainesy1969@GeraintLewis1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amcunningham
@amcunningham@PutneyDebates@tkelsey1@bainesy1969@GeraintLewis I hadn't seen those slides, but that's part of it!3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulbernalUK
@PaulbernalUK ok- now maybe getting somewhere! need relationship between CPRD and care-data to be explicit@tkelsey1@GeraintLewis2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amcunningham
@amcunningham@tkelsey1@GeraintLewis We need a lot more clarity and openness about the whole process.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulbernalUK
@PaulbernalUK@amcunningham@geraintlewis how much more open could we be? Let me know8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tkelsey1
@tkelsey1@PaulbernalUK@amcunningham@geraintlewis More open than only managing to get 15% of pts to understand it > http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/your-practice/practice-topics/it/gps-reveal-extent-of-caredata-ignorance-among-patients-and-staff/20005713.article …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
.@tkelsey1 @PaulbernalUK @amcunningham @geraintlewis Especially when 7% of that 15% then choose to opt out. 85% ignorant, so given no choice
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.