"Midwives given the role of supervising their peers concluded there had been no errors despite obvious evidence of serious mistakes."
-
-
Replying to @ProfJuneG
@JuneinHE Of course it's the regulatory system. Expecting people to 'distance themselves from colleagues' is an unrealistic expectation imho
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfJuneG
@JuneinHE
@C7RKY Not when they are also responsible directly for their development2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrWinTadd
@DrWinTadd@C7RKY I disagree. I'm responsible for the development of my staff. Doesn't stop me investigating and disciplining when necessary3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfJuneG
@JuneinHE
@DrWinTadd The point of regulation tho June, is that you protect against your weakest links. You're clearly ethical. Not all are..2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@DrWinTadd I think that's my point. Not enough people understand what it means for them to have integrity at work.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @ProfJuneG
@JuneinHE
@DrWinTadd After my experience of the 'system', I regard personal ethics as our last stand. Safety net's looking a bit ropey tho?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY @JuneinHE These issues all need to be addressed http://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2013/dec/11/five-obstacles-prevent-acting-concerns …2 replies 1 retweet 1 like
@DrWinTadd @JuneinHE Deck is already stacked with custody of medical records but in that environment, who'd know? Nobody talks. Nobody looks
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.