"Inspectors looked at just over 60 cases".."All but 2 of these cases were chosen at random" >Why were these 2 chosen? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-24833412 …
-
-
@C7RKY@CareQualityComm I did see in one news report that they looked at historical files..... -
.
@katemasters67 Really? That's interesting. If that's so, I'd appreciate an answer to my earlier question please@CareQualityComm. Thanks.. -
@C7RKY@CareQualityComm well definitely as far as 2012. Flagged by whistleblowers again, wonder how many patient complaints ignored... -
@katemasters67 Thanks Kate. The@CareQualityComm account hasn't tweeted since we wrote this. Let's see what they say when they return... -
.
@katemasters67 "Senior managers themselves changed some of the records" Who says managers don't need a statutory duty of candour? Disgrace! -
@C7RKY dreadful isn't it? -
.
@katemasters67 2 years of Colchester whistleblowing & the CQC were still unable to find it? What were they looking at when they inspected?? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY Anyone withholding them can be charged with obstruction (2/2) -
.
@CareQualityComm Really? So when I was told you've no right to access records not 'in use' & trusts refuse to provide them that was wrong?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@C7RKY Inspectors are warranted & can request any files or documents on an inspection under the Health & Social Care Act (1/2)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.