.@bendean1979 @c7rky @modernleader As opposed to you - the font of all knowledge? You're not as 'all-knowing' as you'd like to believe Ben.
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
@c7rky@modernleader you write off med regulation in this specific case, but what specifically is wrong in this instance?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bendean1979
@c7rky@modernleader it is easy to generically criticise, but can you say anything specific to this case please?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bendean1979
@bendean1979@c7rky@modernleader My comment here is a general one, not specific to this case, yes. But I have plenty of specifics thanks...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @bendean1979
@bendean1979@modernleader Indeed. It's what we don't know that commonly catches us out. You'd do well to remember that, as we all should.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @bendean1979
@bendean1979@c7rky@modernleader If I were going to share specifics of the cases I know about with somebody, it wouldn't be you Ben. Sorry.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@bendean1979@modernleader I choose the police, my MP and the CQC instead - with whom I *have* shared such information.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@c7rky@modernleader not helpfup to bring up your case when commenting a totally separate one you admit you don't know much about, is it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bendean1979 @modernleader Oh give it up Ben. I expressed my general opinion. Whether or not that's helpful to you, is of no concern to me.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.