-
-
Replying to @gourmetpenguin
@gourmetpenguin@silv24 Very true. Or potentially life-destroying - to be fair in raising both sides of the vaccination risks story.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gourmetpenguin
@gourmetpenguin I'm afraid I don't regard what passes as 'evidence' of vaccination safety to be scientific. And my own tale would reinforce.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gourmetpenguin
@gourmetpenguin No. It's not science at all. Science demands to be challenged. You don't get to hide evidence & call it 'science' in my book2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gourmetpenguin
@gourmetpenguin Sure. It might take a while for me to dig it out ( I have a LOT saved), but I'll find it for you. :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gourmetpenguin
@C7RKY Thanks for those links. Interesting to understand the other view. We work on risks; doesn't help individuals like your family though1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@gourmetpenguin Appreciated. I work on risks too. But I'm a bit old fashioned; I like to know what they *all* are, before giving consent. :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.