Old time proper gangsters viewed arrest as occuptional hazard& didn't attack police for nicking them. Why can't fuckwit protesters do same?
@Peter_Kirkham Except assaulting police (which is a whole subject on its own) all statute law then? I don't like the way we're going here. >
-
-
@C7RKY Assaulting police is statute law too (s89 Police Act 1996). Not sure of why the fact its statute is a problem-most offences are! -
@Peter_Kirkham Isn't it also assault under common law? I'm starting to see statutes as 'man-made laws'. Some devised from vested interests. -
@C7RKY No. There are no common law assaults any more (except Murder & Manslaughter). Everything else is statute, most since 1861, the most>
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Peter_Kirkham Seems to me that the corporations presently receive more protection than the people. And indeed protection *from* the people! -
@C7RKY From politicians maybe. From dodgy tax collectors. But not from the police. Two wrongs don't make a right& you can only judge police> -
@Peter_Kirkham You realise many will fail to distinguish, when police activity is driven by rules created by corporately-funded politicians? -
@C7RKY The vast majority of the criminal law cannot be characterised as "driven by corporately funded politicians". The overwhelming >
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.