@skwalker1964 @GorwayGlobal Imprecision that's all. Was never claimed to give a perfect picture. Science progresses. #pioneer @Jarmann
-
-
Replying to @NHSwhistleblowr
@NHSwhistleblowr@GorwayGlobal An imprecise lens can be a killer in the wrong hands. For Jarmann not to mind media distortion is astonishing1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @skwawkbox
@skwalker1964@GorwayGlobal That if true would have nothing to do with the science. Was there a better measure 12 years ago?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NHSwhistleblowr
@NHSwhistleblowr@GorwayGlobal There has always been a better measure: proper, structured case-note review and inspection.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @skwawkbox
@skwalker1964@NHSwhistleblowr@GorwayGlobal inspections & case note reviews are only good at assessing quality if objective & rigorous.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @heatherawwood
@heatherawwood@NHSwhistleblowr@GorwayGlobal 2/2 mean that you think they are not?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @skwawkbox
@skwalker1964@NHSwhistleblowr@GorwayGlobal CQC inspections were unfit for purpose, & case note reviews can be superficial & unstructured.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @heatherawwood
@heatherawwood@NHSwhistleblowr@GorwayGlobal CQC furore seems vastly overblown. Anything *can* be superficial etc but doesn't mean 'was'3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @skwawkbox
@skwalker1964@heatherawwood@NHSwhistleblowr@GorwayGlobal Don't know the scale of the problem, but ime 'superficial' was the right word.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@heatherawwood@NHSwhistleblowr@GorwayGlobal Hard to imagine it'd be the same if it was under the scrutiny there is now!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@skwalker1964 @heatherawwood @NHSwhistleblowr @GorwayGlobal I don't know yet - I'll find out soon enough. But it certainly was then...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.