@tarakatesanders Not specific to today. I meant in general. Eg. Other victims having confidence to come forward & case gets strengthened.
-
-
Replying to @tarakatesanders
@tarakatesanders Understood. It's a tricky balance, but fair protection for all should underpin it all. If only...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tarakatesanders
@tarakatesanders Laziness in use of language? Or did you have something slightly more sinister in mind?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tarakatesanders
@tarakatesanders I equally take issue with those who use language just a little *too* cleverly for my liking too. Both ends of spectrum bad.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tarakatesanders
@tarakatesanders I guess so. Although, I'd always rather somebody talked plainly. If their advocacy is a pure one, why wouldn't they?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY Advocacy 'pure': I don't like the word.Client comes first with an eye to justice. It is unfortunately so.@prisonerben@garyslapper2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@tarakatesanders @prisonerben @garyslapper Ok, you don't like the word 'pure'? Pick another...but the principle behind my point stands.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.