@legalaware @FranEntwistleNT I meant there's no reason why it shouldn't attract some(albeit reduced)criminal liability,at least if reckless.
-
-
Replying to @Peter_Kirkham
@Peter_Kirkham@FranEntwistleNT As you'll know, gross negligence manslaughter already attracts criminal liability. (different topic +++)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dr_shibley
@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT Sure...but no equivalent in non-fatal situations.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Peter_Kirkham
@Peter_Kirkham@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT Good point. Fatal ones leave grieving relatives. But non-fatal ones can be just as devastating.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT Intervention in non-fatal cases may ensure grossly negligent member of staff is prevented from killing!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Peter_Kirkham
@Peter_Kirkham@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT As you already know Peter, I'm painfully aware of that fact, so agree entirely with you.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT Prevention should be the main aim of whatever they come up with, not just punishment after tragic event.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Peter_Kirkham
@Peter_Kirkham@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT The biggest single factor outside of staff numbers for me, is legal duty of candour. Remove lies1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@Peter_Kirkham@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT You can't prevent anything, if whatever needs preventing, is hidden by lies & false records.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT >general duty of candour is not there too but it would not apply in case of criminal investigatn anyway1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Peter_Kirkham @legalaware @FranEntwistleNT There's a DoC in the professional codes of sorts, but once lawyers involved, they dismiss codes.
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT That's lawyers for you!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Peter_Kirkham
@Peter_Kirkham@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT Indeed. But once you know that, it makes any claims of prof codes being sufficient, farcical.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.