There is a big difference between intending to harm someone and harming them unintentionally through not doing your job right #NTtwitchat
-
-
Replying to @FranEntwistleNT
@FranEntwistleNT@legalaware#NTtwitchat There is...but that doesn't mean the latter shouldn't be sanctioned at all.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Peter_Kirkham
@Peter_Kirkham@FranEntwistleNT They are currently supposed to be sanctioned by the professional regulatory bodies.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dr_shibley
@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT I meant there's no reason why it shouldn't attract some(albeit reduced)criminal liability,at least if reckless.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Peter_Kirkham
@Peter_Kirkham@FranEntwistleNT As you'll know, gross negligence manslaughter already attracts criminal liability. (different topic +++)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dr_shibley
@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT Sure...but no equivalent in non-fatal situations.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @Peter_Kirkham
@Peter_Kirkham@legalaware@FranEntwistleNT Good point. Fatal ones leave grieving relatives. But non-fatal ones can be just as devastating.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@Peter_Kirkham@FranEntwistleNT It is going to be interesting to see whether this distinction is elaborated further in neglect.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@legalaware If you ever get an hour spare (which I doubt happens often), I'd love to know where you see my mum's case fitting into all this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.