@C7RKY @willcpowell @drunacoales @JamesTitcombe Honestly speaking, yes, 10000 doctors are referred to GMC every year.
-
-
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu
@DrUmeshPrabhu@willcpowell @drunacoales@JamesTitcombe I struggle to relate to that figure with no frame of reference. Relatively high?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@willcpowell @drunacoales@JamesTitcombe 1 in 18 doctors registered with the GMC.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu
@DrUmeshPrabhu@willcpowell @drunacoales@JamesTitcombe As opposed to what, 20 years ago?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@willcpowell @drunacoales@JamesTitcombe Probably 1 in 100 may be (approximate). GMC was not robust in investigating.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu
@DrUmeshPrabhu@willcpowell @drunacoales@JamesTitcombe Still isn't robust ime unless you count robustly resisting complaints. Why more now?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@willcpowell @drunacoales@JamesTitcombe 20 years ago GMC was dominated by doctors. Now 50% doctors. Now Trusts have better systems.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu
@DrUmeshPrabhu@C7RKY @drunacoales@JamesTitcombe With respect, as shown by Robbie's case, GMC is corrupt as is its regulator former CHRE!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willcpowell
@willcpowell@C7RKY @drunacoales@JamesTitcombe True few years ago. Even now not perfect but much improved that too about probity.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrUmeshPrabhu
@DrUmeshPrabhu@C7RKY @drunacoales The GMC claimed at 2009 JR that they COULD NOT investigate a doctor without receiving a complaint. Liars!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@willcpowell @DrUmeshPrabhu @drunacoales You'd think being a judicial review, someone might have pointed that out at the time? Maybe just me
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.