@WikiPickie @iHealthP @Jarmann @skwalker1964 Think I've lost the thread of this metaphor. Should this explain choosing to undermine warning?
@WikiPickie @iHealthP @Jarmann @skwalker1964 In such circumstances, you check out all warnings, surely? Even suspected exaggerated ones.
-
-
@C7RKY@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Yes,u'd check out all warnings u'd b grateful 4 true ones u'd hate false ones u'd b wary if exaggrtd -
@WikiPickie@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 But if I leave the metaphor & consider my own regulated background? In that, you ignore nothing -
@C7RKY@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Yes,u ignore nothing & check each is true If warned of fish but u find bread,u butter it not fillet -
@WikiPickie@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Agreed, you act based upon what you find. But you go & see what's there to be found, every time -
@WikiPickie@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 And as for paying for a report to discredit an inconvenient warning message? I don't like that. -
@C7RKY@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Yes,as u said,u act on wot u find U go&see what's there If it's x, u warn it's x - not Y, else a lie -
@WikiPickie@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Exactly. If a warning light goes on in cockpit you don't try & pretend it didn't. You check why -
@C7RKY@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Yes,if warning light on,u don't ignore,u go & c If red,brakes faild If orange,oxygen low Need truth - 29 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.