@iHealthP @Jarmann @skwalker1964 So more than just inertia then? Active steps taken to avoid. Doesn't help claims of innocence any, does it?
-
-
@WikiPickie@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 pass (appropriate for healthcare) where all life is precious & even small obstacles threaten. > -
@WikiPickie@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 In such circumstances, you check out all warnings, surely? Even suspected exaggerated ones. -
@C7RKY@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Yes,u'd check out all warnings u'd b grateful 4 true ones u'd hate false ones u'd b wary if exaggrtd -
@WikiPickie@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 But if I leave the metaphor & consider my own regulated background? In that, you ignore nothing -
@C7RKY@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Yes,u ignore nothing & check each is true If warned of fish but u find bread,u butter it not fillet -
@WikiPickie@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Agreed, you act based upon what you find. But you go & see what's there to be found, every time -
@WikiPickie@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 And as for paying for a report to discredit an inconvenient warning message? I don't like that. -
@C7RKY@iHealthP@Jarmann@skwalker1964 Yes,as u said,u act on wot u find U go&see what's there If it's x, u warn it's x - not Y, else a lie - 31 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.