@Modernleader @NHSWatch @Jarmann @teddygroves @rogerkline 100% so far?! Youre joking. Testimony to Francis included examples of incorrect.
-
-
Replying to @skwawkbox
@skwalker1964@Modernleader@rogerkline Francis>SoS “The high HMSR at Mid Staffs, however provided compelling grounds for an investigation…”1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jarmann
@Jarmann@Modernleader@rogerkline And that's relevant to the fact that Kark et al heard of cases where HSMR misled, how, exactly?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @skwawkbox
@skwalker1964@Modernleader@rogerkline Why do you doubt the opinions of Francis, Sir Bruce Keogh and Harvard experts re HSMRs as a warning?2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jarmann
@Jarmann@Modernleader Don't really give fig for 'Harvard experts'. Keogh good - but he's v equivocal re HSMR. SHMI better, but still flawed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @skwawkbox
@skwalker1964 There is consistent opinion regarding the value of HSMRs at Mid Staffs, even if you don’t care a fig https://www.dropbox.com/s/n194w08lllokv7t/Opinions%20regarding%20HSMRs%20in%20alerting%20to%20Mid%20Staffs.doc …2 replies 4 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @skwawkbox
@skwalker1964 Read these opinions https://www.dropbox.com/s/n194w08lllokv7t/Opinions%20regarding%20HSMRs%20in%20alerting%20to%20Mid%20Staffs.doc … Francis/Harvard “completely irresponsible not to aggressively investigate further”1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Jarmann
@Jarmann@skwalker1964 So data accuracy debate aside, a problem was indicated but not investigated & the indication turned out to be valid?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@skwalker1964 @Jarmann So why didn't the issues emerge earlier, as a result of those investigations? Where was the intervention when needed?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.