@MichaelAvenging Not just me then? :) It's certainly about money. With those who stand to benefit financially, in a position to rig the game
-
-
Replying to @Rachelbacchae
@MichaelAvenging Quite. It's a small step to move from seeing people as patients, into regarding them as inconvenient 'costs' to be avoided.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rachelbacchae
@MichaelAvenging Don't have your depth of experience, but my own certainly suggests that lethal corners get cut. Then hidden, if challenged.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rachelbacchae
@MichaelAvenging Totally agree. Would've worked for me. Instead, consent form was fraudulently amended & a forgery presented when challenged
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rachelbacchae
@MichaelAvenging It is. As was the surgery (exceeding consent) which is what he was trying to hide by changing consent form. Police informed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MichaelAvenging Hard to explain wrong site surgery & resulting neg frozen section - but then proceeding w/o clinical diagnosis anyway. :-/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.