@EviltheCat @bbw1984 @dwilliamsHSJ Hi ETC. Currently paper records can have entries added/amended/removed to suit pre-agreed stance against>
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY
@EviltheCat@bbw1984 @dwilliamsHSJ complaints. The fact that custody of records is in the hands of potential defendant, makes this v unfair.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@EviltheCat@bbw1984 @dwilliamsHSJ After my own experience, I'm v conscious of the importance of control of, & access to, these records now.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EviltheCat
@EviltheCat@bbw1984 @dwilliamsHSJ I def see the value in sharing e-info, but I also see the dangers. V wary of gov/med world's motivations.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EviltheCat
@EviltheCat@bbw1984 @dwilliamsHSJ That wouldn't help with my case. It was the doctors & the NHS trust, who fraudulently amended records.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EviltheCat
@EviltheCat@bbw1984 @dwilliamsHSJ I'd like to think it has the potential to do that too. I just want to examine the loopholes v closely! :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
@C7RKY@EviltheCat@bbw1984 @dwilliamsHSJ also important to note the ICO said the NHS had a "systemic problem" keeping data secure3 replies 1 retweet 1 like
@bbw1984 @EviltheCat @dwilliamsHSJ Fair point. NHS get a mention here, but no telling what data was put at risk >
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325624/Hackers-believed-gods-cyberspace-jailed-attacks-CIA-FBI-NHS-computers.html?ITO=socialnet-twitter-mailonline …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.