-> @C7RKY Of course, single jabs took more resources; small extra period when child not wholly immunised, but parents agreement paramount ->
@paulrogers002 For those with time & determination, I'd steer them towards NICE clinical guidelines & underpinning research. Doctors' rules!
-
-
@C7RKY This is stuff that every potential patient really needs to know! -
@paulrogers002 Very much so. Most will get steered towards NHS choices. Has it's uses, but there are a LOT of things not detailed on there. -
@C7RKY I can imagine - wouldn't want to 'confuse' anyone, eh? With their rights or anything like that.. -
@paulrogers002 Haha! You should see how the concept of consent is twisted into a 'partnership decision'. Have to dig V deep to find reality! -
@C7RKY Hm - so what is a 'partnership decision' then? Doctor telling patient what to do? -
@paulrogers002 Exactly. Followed by patient accepting decision without challenge, 'in partnership'. It's an overlay, to disguise real rules. -
@C7RKY Incredible what people will tolerate, when it comes to it. This 'agreement' have any legal force? -
@paulrogers002 Yes & no. 2 levels of consent (not talked about v often). Clinical negligence is higher level & is civil matter, but doc's >
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.